| Take Action! |
Help change our Church and world:
| |
| Upcoming Events... |
Friday, Sep 10
Friday, Sep 24
Saturday, Oct 09
Friday, Nov 05
Friday, Nov 05
Friday, Nov 12
Monday, Nov 15
Friday, Nov 19
More events... | |
|
Home > General News
 More delete-B overtures pass! |
|
Friday, November 11 2005 @ 06:25 PM
(Updated 11/20/2005 with additional information on the Newton Presbytery vote.)
On Tuesday Nov. 8, the Presbytery of Lake Michigan passed a concurrence with the
Heartland delete-B overture by a 2-to-1 margin, with a vote count of approximately 78 to 35 according to reports we've received so far. Opponents of the concurrence tried the usual delay tactics, including an attempt to refer the concurrence motion to a special committee and an attempt to postpone discussion until 2006, however these delay attempts were voted down.
The Lake Michigan concurrence overture was proposed to Presbytery by North Presbyterian Church. Our thanks go out to all those who worked to bring the concurrence overture to Presbytery and get it passed.
On Nov. 8, the Presbytery of Newton also voted 50 to 35 in the affirmative to concur with the Heartland overture. One More Light supporter and Newton Presbytery member who was on the floor for the vote sent us these comments:
Most of the discussion on the floor had to do with whether or not this was a good thing to do in light of the Task Force report...
On a personal note I can tell you that the report has made me even more convinced that G-6.0106b has to come out of the Book of Order asap. We can never have a fair
dialog unless there is a level playing field. I've been trying to talk to and listen to people as per the Task Force report for years now and it is very clear to me that we are just playing games with dialog until GLBT
persons are fully included. This feels like another stall tactic to me.
These two delete-B overtures or concurrences bring the total known delete-B overture count to 10. Half of these have passed after the release of the PCUSA's Theological Task Force report, which was
heavily criticized by progressive Presbyterian groups for its suggestion that the 2006 General Assembly should take no steps to remove anti-gay Presbyterian rules. |
|
|